|
Trying to figure out what the Bush environmental policy is from week to week
takes a lot of work and, even then, it's like watching some crazed
break-dancer make up the steps as he goes along. I think Bush wants to do the
right thing, but all those polls he's not supposed to be using to guide
policy are coming back saying, "environment issues will get you kicked out in
2004 if people think you want to chop down all the forests, drill a lot of
wells, and hate fuzzy little animals." There is only one, hard fast rule in
politics and it is "Get re-elected!"
It is testimony to the decades of brainwashing and lies that the Greens have
foisted on America, infiltrating the nation's classrooms to make sure kids
grow up thinking the Earth is doomed, urban sprawl is threatening all the
wildlife, generating energy is a bad thing, the ozone is disappearing,
pesticides will kill humans, not the bugs, et cetera. Frankly, it is very
hard for a President to push too hard against this wall of ignorance.
So let's start by giving the President credit for dropkicking the UN Global
Warming Treaty into the twilight zone. In its current form, meteorologists
estimate it would reduce the calculated temperature in 2050 by 0.02 degrees.
That's one fiftieth of one degree and an ordinary thermometer can't even
measure it. It already exempts nations like China and India. Combined, their
populations represent a huge chunk of humanity and, if global warming was
real, it would kill them like flies in a microwave oven. Only, it isn't real.
No more than the Green threats of a coming Ice Age back in the 1970's. The
Greens are stone killers, soulless liars for whom their secret agenda of
bringing about the triumph of Marxism requires the destruction of
industrialization and democracy.
The President is trying to cover his backside by pledging an additional $120
million to study global warming. This is an utter and total waste of money
because the Earth has not warmed in a half century of measuring such things.
Politically, though, the proposal gives him cover.
The professional environmental activist organizations have been mounting a
full-scale attack on things like Bush's effort to gut the Endangered Species
Act that would keep them from launching an endless series of lawsuits like
the one that ruined the lives of 1,400 formers in the Klamath Falls Valley.
Ironically, the proposal to change the Act comes from the US Fish and
Wildlife Service, the agency with the primary responsibility to enforce it.
What the Green groups are really worried about is the fact they will lose
millions of taxpayer's dollars that go into their coffers when they get paid
for successfully suing the government. Take away that incentive and the
lawsuits will end!
The Bush administration has been enjoying a number of victories of late. In
May a federal judge in Idaho blocked a new government regulation that would
"protect" 60 million acres of national forests from logging and road
construction, a leftover from the Clinton years. Under Clinton, the US Forest
Service and environmentalists had worked hard to make sure that Americans
would never enjoy the use of their forests for the reason they were set aside.
In mid-July, the administration announced that a rule aimed at reducing
storm-water and agriculture pollution of some 21,000 lakes and streams needed
to be put on hold for closer examination. Yet another leftover regulation
from the Clinton years, it would require billions of dollars be allocated to
cleanup these waterways, but the truth is no one really knows if any
"pollution" exists. A lawsuit challenging the program was brought by the
American Farm Bureau, along with other trade groups who believe, correctly,
that it exceeds the Environmental Protection Agency's authority. EPA
Director, Christie Whitman, favors their position.
In another under-reported move, the Bush administration is advancing a plan
to cut federal environmental enforcement operations and to shift resources
back to the states. This is a particularly clever notion-considering the man
is supposed to be a big dope-because most states are unable and unwilling to
vigorously enforce most of the federal environmental laws. Why? Because they
are idiotic, but mostly because they drain scarce financial resources that
would be better applied to maintaining roads, bridges, and other needs.
America's basic infrastructure is in bad need of repair because of sheer
neglect.
There is more evidence that EPA Director Whitman, is finally getting good
guidance on why she was chosen for the office. Christie is the anti-Carol
Browner, the woman who ruled the EPA throughout all of the Clinton years. So,
now we hear that Christie is proposing sweeping changes in the regulations of
power plant pollution that would replace five of the government's toughest
programs with a single, flexible approach favored by the utilities. Why is
this a good thing? Because this more sensible approach would encourage them
to invest the billions needed to upgrade existing generation facilities and
build more. America could face brownouts and blackouts from coast to coast
without these changes.
Two steps forward. One step backward. Christie has spoken of proposing rules
"to help sweep away the haze at many of America's national parks." The
scientific name for the haze is volatile organic components. For those who
slept through science class or were probably never taught this, all forests
naturally emit VOCs. That's what trees do. They give off all kinds of VOCs,
especially when they die and begin to decay. The real reason our forests have
haze is that these trees have not been logged or cleared away. It's also the
real reason we are encountering more and more horrendous forest fires. This is
all part of the Green agenda. They hate timber companies and love forest
fires. Meanwhile, the cost of building a new home has soared and we're
actually importing wood from Canada. That makes a lot of sense, eh?
The Bush energy program is, of course, coming under fire because the Greens
fear that America might actually be able to reduce its dependency on foreign
oil by drilling in Alaska and in the Gulf of Mexico for our own damned oil.
So you will hear them bleat and carry on about the horrid energy producers
who only want to profit off of heating your home or putting gas in your car's
tanks. This nation would go to hell in a week without this energy.
As far as I can tell, the Bush administration is really trying to make the
right moves to pull the plug on a lot of bad environmental laws and
regulations that only serve to drive up the cost of everything while
strangling this nation's ability to provide the energy we need, the food we
need, the timber we need for new homes, and everything else required to get
our economy back on the fast track.
Alan Caruba is founder of The National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for
information about scare campaigns to influence public opinion and policy. The Center maintains an Internet site at www.anxietycenter.com.
Copyright, Alan Caruba, 2001
Published by permission.
|