|
Gov. Gray Davis, who has emergency powers to take such action, was reported
to be "considering" the idea. "This is not a radical notion," said Angelides. "This is a self-preservation notion. What's at stake is the very fiscal survivability of the state of California."
No, what's at stake is the right of any state to regulate a business into
bankruptcy and then take its assets for its own political survival.
The politicians and regulatory bureaucrats of California ignored its growing
need for electrical energy, refusing time and again, for two decades to
permit the building of new plants for the generation of electricity and the
transmission lines required to distribute it. Now these same politicians
have the nerve to claim the utilities were "gouging" their customers for
electricity they were forced to buy on the spot market.
Everything that occurred to the energy producers was the direct result of the
legislation passed by California's politicians, all pandering to the
environmentalists demanding "alternative sources" and other proposals that
totally denied the most basic law of supply and demand. This is why
Californians are now paying the highest rates in the history of that state.
The legislation that supposedly "deregulated" the utilities actually put an
end to any long-term business planning for new power plants, while also
ending the need for short-term planning. Electricity would literally be
bought one day before its purchase and use by consumers.
Writing in the May issue of The Intellectual Activist, Jack Wakeland
expressed it this way: "The California economy had become exposed to a risk
not seen in America since the nineteenth century, a risk pre-industrial
agrarian societies are compelled to accept. The state's high-technology
economy had become vulnerable to the weather."
The weather! Here's what happens when Mother Nature doesn't cooperate.
Hydropower, dependent on rainfall and the melting of snow packs, ceases to be
available. That's exactly what happened in Oregon, Washington and Idaho,
where the geniuses of California thought they could buy cheap electrical
power forever. Then on March 19th temperatures in Los Angeles reached an
unseasonable 87 degrees. Everyone turned on their air conditioners. Shortly
thereafter, the rolling blackouts began to cut off a half million people at a
time in order to protect the system.
Shamelessly, on Tuesday, May 14th, the Democratic Party in the person of Dick
Gephardt was claiming that "Electricity and gasoline are like air or water
because, without them, people can't do the things that all of us, as
Americans, take for granted." NO! We are expected to pay for things like the
water from our tap, the gasoline from the pump, and the electricity from the
socket. They are not free, they have never been free. Someone had to invest
millions to produce and distribute these products.
The Democrats would rather demagogue this issue than join in solving it.
In a particularly ugly way, Gephardt cited the administration's
"unprecedented ties to the energy industry" without mentioning the
restrictions imposed by Congress and regulatory agencies that have caused the
problem. Also unmentioned were Bill Clinton's "unprecedented" ties to illegal
Red Chinese donations the Democratic Party received, his raid on the nation's
strategic oil reserves, or the Gore tax on gasoline that is still in effect.
The Democrats are gambling on one question: Just how dumb are Americans?
Here's a partial answer. Citing a poll taken May 7-9, USA Today reported that
only 38% favored opening the Alaskan Wildlife Refuge for oil exploration, but
63% favored drilling for natural gas on federal lands. What's the difference?
None. Here's where it gets really scary. Fully 91% would support investment
in solar or wind production of energy. Remember what happens when Mother
Nature doesn't cooperate? Lights don't go on. The only good news from the
poll was that at least 83% understood the need to build new power generating
plants. Did they, however, understand you have to mine coal or drill for oil
and natural gas to power most of these plants?
Consider how another state dealt with its need for electrical energy. Texas,
the home state of George W. Bush, has an oversupply. The reason for this is
that Texas chose not to over-regulate, making it a very good place for
providers of electricity to do business. It is expected that by 2002, Texas's
surplus could exceed 15,000 megawatts. This estimate is based on the fact
that there are 27 new generating stations currently under construction!
In California, however, the Greens and the politicians who pandered to
them---the same idiots who perpetrated their energy crisis---are letting it
be known they intend to seize the assets of privately owned companies. Who
would want to invest there? And, as for those people invested in California
energy companies, you can kiss their retirement and other plans goodbye!
The Bush administration is doing the right thing. Instead of band-aid
approaches to the problem, they are telling Americans that this nation with
its growing population and growing economy must build more power plants, must
give relief to refineries working at 96% of their capacity by encouraging oil
companies to build more and expand the capacity of existing ones. To achieve
this, however, will require junking a ton of EPA regulations standing in the way.
We need to drill in a tiny section of the most God-forsaken area of Alaska
where the sun does not shine nine months a year. Why? Because there's an
estimated 16 billion barrels of oil there. We must begin to drill offshore of
California and offshore of Florida where more oil exists. We must begin to
build nuclear plants as well because, glory be, they don't emit any
"pollution."
When California runs out of money to buy electricity, it will become just
another third-world nation where no one knows when the electricity will be
turned on or off. This is what happens when people listen to the torrent of
lies about "pollution" caused by the use of "fossil fuels" and dependency on
"alternative energy sources" that are so costly and ineffective as to be
useless.
When this nation deregulates energy production and distribution, we will have
MORE energy. Texas is proof of that. It's called "free market principles" and
Capitalism. It is the only way to avoid a worsening California crisis and the
fascist response being proposed to "solve" it.
Alan Caruba is founder of The National Anxiety Center, a clearinghouse for
information about scare campaigns to influence public opinion and policy. The Center maintains an Internet site at www.anxietycenter.com.
Copyright, Alan Caruba, 2001
Published by permission.
|